So the general argument they have is, if science can't prove the paranormal phenomenon that does not mean our explanation (which has no sound basis) is wrong.
The point they seem to be missing is that, no one can just make a claim without trying to explain or prove it. The onus is on the person making the claim to prove that this happens, by any method that you choose. You can't say I am right until you prove me to be wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment